Current:Home > reviewsHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -StockFocus
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-25 01:33:27
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (852)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Goldman Sachs expects the Fed to cut interest rates 5 times this year, starting in March
- 32 things we learned from NFL playoffs' wild-card round: More coaching drama to come?
- Do you need to file a state income tax return for 2023? Maybe. Here's how it works
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- List of top Emmy Award winners
- Lawmakers announce deal to expand child tax credit and extend business tax breaks
- The Excerpt podcast: Caucus Day in Iowa
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- A surgeon general report once cleared the air about smoking. Is it time for one on vaping?
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Kieran Culkin explains his 'rude' baby request: What you didn't see on TV at the Emmys
- A middle-aged Millionaires' Row: Average US 50-something now has net worth over $1M
- Kansas City Chiefs vs. Buffalo Bills: Odds and how to watch AFC divisional playoff game
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Iran strikes targets in northern Iraq and Syria as regional tensions escalate
- How cold is it going to get today? See where record-low temperatures will hit during the winter storm
- Elton John Reacts to Becoming an EGOT After 2023 Emmys Win
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
What Pedro Pascal Had to Say About Kieran Culkin at Emmys
MLK family members to serve as honorary team captains at Eagles-Buccaneers wild-card playoff game
Kieran Culkin explains his 'rude' baby request: What you didn't see on TV at the Emmys
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
All My Children Actor Alec Musser's Cause of Death Revealed
Will Kalen DeBoer succeed at Alabama? Four keys for Nick Saban's successor
AP VoteCast: Iowa caucusgoers want big changes, see immigration as more important than the economy