Current:Home > MyKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -StockFocus
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 08:21:37
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (38)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeals From Fossil Fuel Companies in Climate Change Lawsuits
- Get the Know the New Real Housewives of New York City Cast
- California Snowpack May Hold Record Amount of Water, With Significant Flooding Possible
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- UN Considering Reforms to Limit Influence of Fossil Fuel Industry at Global Climate Talks
- Stanley Tucci Addresses 21-Year Age Gap With Wife Felicity Blunt
- The Truth About Michael J. Fox and Tracy Pollan's Inspiring Love Story
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- A New Battery Intended to Power Passenger Airplanes and EVs, Explained
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Ariana Grande Joined by Wicked Costar Jonathan Bailey and Andrew Garfield at Wimbledon
- Carbon Removal Projects Leap Forward With New Offset Deal. Will They Actually Help the Climate?
- In the Florida Panhandle, a Black Community’s Progress Is Threatened by a Proposed Liquified Natural Gas Plant
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- For the First Time in Nearly Two Decades, the EPA Announces New Rules to Limit Toxic Air Pollutants From Chemical and Plastics Plants
- Shell Sued Over Air Emissions at Pennsylvania’s New Petrochemical Plant
- Shell Refinery Unit Had History of Malfunctions Before Fire
Recommendation
From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
All the Tragedy That Has Led to Belief in a Kennedy Family Curse
Vecinos de La Villita temen que empeore la contaminación ambiental por los planes de ampliación de la autopista I-55
Q&A: The ‘Perfect, Polite Protester’ Reflects on Her Sit-in to Stop a Gas Compressor Outside Boston
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Keep Up With Kylie Jenner and Jordyn Woods' Friendship: From Tristan Thompson Scandal to Surprise Reunion
The Truth About Michael J. Fox and Tracy Pollan's Inspiring Love Story
Emily Blunt Reveals Cillian Murphy’s Strict Oppenheimer Diet